U72 Biolab Ventilation and Vestibule Upgrade / U72 Fuselage Outdoor Upgrade

Tender Destination

a) Tenders are to be submitted by email only: National Research Council Canada

NRC.BidReceiving-Receptiondes Soumissions.CNRC@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca

Endorsed “Tender for (insert title of work as it appears in the drawings and specifications)” and must bear the name and address of the tenderer.

b) Unless otherwise specified, the only documents required to be submitted with the tender are the Tender form and the Bid Security.

Selection Criteria

Potential bidders will be rated in a combination of technical score and price rating. For this project the total score will be established as follows:

Technical rating 40% = Technical Score (Points) Price rating 60% = Price Score (Points) Total Score = Max. 100 points

Mandatory requirements

Failure to meet the mandatory requirement will render the proposal as non-compliant and no further evaluation will be carried out.

Item Mandatory Criteria Proposal Page #(s) 1 The Proponent must have a minimum of ten (10) years’ experience in the execution of mechanical project, and as a contractor providing construction services comparable to this tender. Provide a company profile and relevant history as described in item #1 of the evaluated technical criteria.

2 The Proponent must supply a CV for the proposed construction site supervisor. The proposed construction site supervisor must possess a minimum of 7 years’ experience in contract/construction supervision, as a site supervisor or similar position. Two pages (letter size) maximum for this criteria. 3 The Proponent must supply a CV for the proposed construction Project Manager.

The proposed project Manager must possess a minimum of 7 years’ experience in contract/construction administration, as a Project, Manager or similar position. Two pages (letter size) maximum for this criteria.

Include this table with your proposal and indicate the proposal page where the information can be found.

Any Proposal which fails to meet any of the following mandatory requirements will be considered non-compliant and will not be given further consideration. Each requirement should be addressed separately.

Evaluated Technical Criteria

Item Evaluated Technical Criteria Proposal Page # (s) Max Score 1 Demonstrated experience by the Proponent providing general construction services relevant to this project. Include 2 comparable projects completed by the proponents firm in the last 10 years with reference names & phone numbers. Maximum 1 page per project.

Evaluations will take into account relevance compared to the scope of this tender (up to 3 point for each example project) and whether the reference was satisfied with the work completed (up to 1 point for each example project).

It is the responsibility of the bidder to ensure the contact information for the reference is accurate and available to provide feedback in less than 48Hres. If the reference cannot be reached or declines to provide input the proponent will receive a score of 0/1 for that example. 8 2 Qualifications and overall experience of proposed construction site supervisor.

The proposed construction site supervisor must possess a minimum of 7 years’ experience, CV will be scored on the basis of related experience (up to 4 points), experience acting as a construction site supervisor on federal government construction projects (up to 3 points). Include detailed examples of 2 past projects. CV should be no longer than 3 pages.

6 3 Qualifications and overall experience of proposed construction Project Manager. The proposed project Manager must possess a minimum of 7 years’ experience. CV will be scored on the basis of related experience (up to 3 points), experience acting as a construction site supervisor on federal government construction projects (up to 2 points).

Include detailed examples of 2 past projects. CV should be no longer than 3 pages. 6 4 The Proponent must provide their construction schedule for this project, from award to final completion, detailing major milestones, critical path elements, and associated timelines.

Schedule evaluation will be based on whether it meets the completion date noted in the tender documents (up to 2 point), and if the tasks and associated timelines demonstrate the contractor understands the scope of work (up to 3 points). Contractor must flag any issue with long lead items into their schedule and possible delay if any. 5 Total 25

Include this table with your proposal and indicate the proposal page where the information can be found.

Evaluation and Rating

Financial Proposal will remain sealed and only the technical components of the proposals considered responsive will be reviewed, evaluated and rated by an NRC Evaluation Board in accordance with the criteria listed in the evaluated technical criteria table.

No further consideration will be given to proponents not a