Uplands Campus Pedestrian Pathway

NRC.BidReceiving-Receptiondes Soumissions.CNRC@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca

Endorsed “Tender for (insert title of work as it appears in the drawings and specifications)” and must bear the name and address of the tenderer.

b) Unless otherwise specified, the only documents required to be submitted with the tender are the Tender form and the Bid Security.

Selection Criteria

Potential bidders will be rated in a combination of technical score and price rating. For this project the total score will be established as follows:

Technical rating 40% = Technical Score (Points) Price rating 60% = Price Score (Points) Total Score = Max. 100 points

Mandatory requirements

Failure to meet the mandatory requirement will render the proposal as non-compliant and no further evaluation will be carried out.

Item Mandatory Criteria Proposal Page #(s) 1 The Proponent must have a minimum of ten (10) years’ experience as a general contractor providing construction services comparable to this tender. Provide a company profile and relevant history as described in item #1 of the evaluated technical criteria.

2 The Proponent must supply a CV for the proposed Construction Site Supervisor and Project Manager. Construction Site Supervisor and Project Manager must each possess a minimum of 7 years’ experience in a similar position. Note: It will not be acceptable for the Project Manager to act as a site supervisor.

3 The Proponent must prove to be licensed to perform work in the province of Ontario.

Include this table with your proposal and indicate the proposal page where the information can be found.

Any Proposal which fails to meet any of the following mandatory requirements will be considered non-compliant and will not be given further consideration. Each requirement should be addressed separately.

Evaluated Technical Criteria

Item Evaluated Technical Criteria Proposal Page # (s) Max Score 1 Demonstrated experience by the Proponent providing general contracting construction services relevant to this project. Include two (2) comparable projects completed by the proponent’s firm in the last Ten (10) years with reference names & email address.

Evaluations will take into account relevance compared to the scope of this tender (up to 3 points for each example project) and whether the reference was satisfied with the work completed (up to 1 point for each example project). It is the responsibility of the bidder to ensure the contact information for the reference is accurate.

If the reference cannot be reached or declines to provide input the proponent will receive a score of 0/1 for that example. A total of three (3) pages (letter size) maximum for this criteria. 8 2 Qualifications and overall experience of proposed Construction Site Supervisor. CV will be scored on the basis of related experience.

Include detailed examples of 2 past projects (up to 2 points), experience acting as a construction site supervisor on federal government construction projects (up to 3 points) and training/education (up to 1 point). A total of two (2) pages (letter size) maximum for this criteria. 6 3 Qualifications and overall experience of proposed Construction Project Manager.

CV will be scored on the basis of related experience. Include detailed examples of 2 past projects (up to 2 points), experience acting as a construction project manager on federal government construction projects (up to 3 points) and training/education (up to 1 point). A total of two (2) pages (letter size) maximum for this criteria.

6 4 The Proponent to provide their construction schedule for this project, from award to final completion, detailing major milestones, critical path elements, and associated timelines.

Schedule evaluation will be based on whether it meets the completion date noted in the tender documents (up to 2 points), and if the tasks and associated timelines demonstrate the contractor understands the scope of work (up to 3 points). A total of two pages (tabloid size) maximum for this criteria. 5 Total 25

Include this table with your proposal and indicate the proposal page where the information can be found.

Evaluation and Rating

Financial Proposal will remain sealed and only the technical components of the proposals considered responsive will be reviewed, evaluated and rated by an NRC Evaluation Board in accordance with the criteria listed in the evaluated technical criteria table.

No further consideration will be given to proponents not achieving the pass mark of 17.5 out of 25 (70%). The successful Bidder shall be the one who accumulates the highest combined score of the technical assessment (40%) and tendered amount (60%), as shown below:

TABLE A Bidder #1 Bidder #2 Bidder #3 Technical score 18 out of 25 20 out of 25 23 out of 25 Tendered amount $190,000 $200,000 $210,000

For information only: Technical score (40%) Tendered amount score (60%) Final score